Category Archives: copyright reform

Copyright: get involved!


As usual, I’m concerned about copyright and intellectual property.

As you can imagine, I’m on the side of Electronic Frontier Foundation, Open Media and lots of individuals who are presenting testimony to the American courts, and also campaigning against the undemocratic trans-Atlantic and trans-Pacific trade treaties that will curb intellectual rights if the industry moguls in conjunction with some politicians have their way.

Open Media have started a way to get all of us participating in discussion of the issues and this is a crowd-sourcing tool to enable you to have your say. This link is my URL for sharing but if you join in you get your own to pass on to your friends.

If anyone is interested in the matter but doesn’t know where to start reading I can give you links to various articles that will give you some ideas. I hope some of you are already interested and will click on the link!

All of us benefit from the historical sharing of intellectual property – the very recent changes in copyright and patent law benefit the industrial giants but not always the creators of content. Under present restrictions and those that the proponents of new laws would like to impose we would never have had much of Shakespeare’s work, a great deal of classical art and music, or a lot of highly regarded novels. Transformative works benefit society as a whole and contribute to cultural growth. There need to be systems in place to ensure that creators are rewarded but the current crop of laws have very little to do with that.

It took this issue – very dear to my heart – to drag me out of a kind of mid-winte lethargy fuelled partly by illness over Christmas and New Year and partly, perhaps, by the weather… I shall now make an end-of-January resolution to post more often!

1 Comment

Posted by on January 29, 2014 in copyright reform




I am very pleased about the mass protest that has stopped SOPA and PIPA for the time being. I am horrified at the way the mass entertainment industry has taken upon itself the role of policing the public outside as well as inside the USA.

They claim to be fighting piracy but I beg to differ. Piracy (which is to be deplored) is the use of someone else’s work without consent for profit, either not sharing that profit with the originator or seriously decreasing the originator’s chances of making a profit.

Sites that provide downloads of films, music, and books without consent,for payment, are piracy and of course should be prevented from operating. However, karaoke sessions, remix vids on YouTube, fanfiction, reviews that quote/illustrate, etc. etc. are not piracy. In fact, they often act as free advertising for the original works.

Some free downloads of films etc. are piracy but others are a desperate attempt to share with the world the work of actors, singers etc. whose films/TV shows/music have been published solely in the USA and are otherwise inaccessible to the rest of us. In a sense it is the American entertainment industry who are the pirates because they steal the creations of artists in all genres, not rewarding them sufficiently and not allowing global disribution of their work.

SOPA and PIPA are not the way to fight internet piracy. They are, it seems, the way to get a large proportion of the world very incensed indeed! Including me. I have signed various petitions, donated to more than one organisation, talked to anyone who would listen and followed the debates, official and unofficial, closely.

I am also concerned at the closing down of Megaupload and the implications of that, and the current attempt to extradite Richard Dwyer from the UK because of actions he took solely in the UK. More reading, petitioning etc.

I am not, at present, in favour of Black March. In its present form I think the idea could hit a number of independent producers/publishers/record companies who in fact supported the protests. Any attempt to make Black March more specific in its targets would, I think, make it unwieldy.

A further matter for concern is ACTA. This is a global treaty, on its way to being signed by about 39 countries. It purports to combat the manufacture and sale of counterfeit goods and the copying of patented medicines (for use in the third world – go figure – Oxfam are protesting loudly). Because the treaty wording is broadly and loosely drafted the results will be open to abuse, whatever the current governments say about their intent. There will be the potential to enforce invasions of privacy on a massive scale ‘to prevent piracy’.

Look at this YouTube vid:

Then subscribe to this news feed:

And if you are in UK sign this petition:

I intend to follow matters assiduously and will be glad to find ways of protesting and publicising the issues. I have contacted campaigning groups, my MP and my MEPs.

I know that this matter is merely shelved in US and not dead at all elsewhere. We need to stay alert.

What do you think? And can you help to spread the word?


Posted by on January 23, 2012 in copyright reform, protest